<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870</id><updated>2011-12-22T09:48:16.562-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Musings of a Seminarian</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>11</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-116807309239921048</id><published>2007-01-06T00:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-02-14T15:35:41.123-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Inerrancy, Science and Scripture</title><summary type='text'>Over the years I have been taught that God's revelation can be viewed as two types, General and Special revelation.General Revelation is God revealing Himself through His works, which can be seen in the creation around us by any person at any time in history.Special Revelation would include God speaking to mankind through "special" efforts on His part. This, in my view, (which is a little </summary><link rel='related' href='http://www.christilling.de/blog/2006/11/ets-adopt-chicago-statement-on.html#comments' title='Inerrancy, Science and Scripture'/><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/116807309239921048/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=116807309239921048' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/116807309239921048'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/116807309239921048'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2007/01/inerrancy-science-and-scripture.html' title='Inerrancy, Science and Scripture'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-114248210219423219</id><published>2006-03-15T20:08:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-05-01T23:20:35.390-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Village Green: The Shekinah Glory</title><summary type='text'>An interesting Blog.The Village Green: The Shekinah Glory</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/114248210219423219/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=114248210219423219' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/114248210219423219'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/114248210219423219'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/03/village-green-shekinah-glory.html' title='The Village Green: The Shekinah Glory'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-114222738272630647</id><published>2006-03-12T21:22:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-04-10T17:13:16.326-07:00</updated><title type='text'>And Never the Twain Shall Meet: The Dilemma of Public Education</title><summary type='text'>&lt;&gt;I wrote this as a comment to a blog at The Pandas Thumb. It refers to a Wisconsin Law regarding the teaching of Intelligent Design in science classes.The law was quoted there as follows:    SECTION 1. 118.018 of the statutes is created to read: 118.018 Science instruction. The school board shall ensure that any material presented as science within the school curriculum complies with all of the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/114222738272630647/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=114222738272630647' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/114222738272630647'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/114222738272630647'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/03/and-never-twain-shall-meet-dilemma-of.html' title='And Never the Twain Shall Meet: The Dilemma of Public Education'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-113973041640616195</id><published>2006-02-11T23:44:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-03-04T14:20:24.173-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Do we need to know anything?</title><summary type='text'>Epistemology has progressed (regressed?) to the point that skepticism is the order of the day.Popper says that Science cannot prove anything.The world is filled with belief systems that are internally rationally coherent but are without external reasons to believe in any one of them. We cannot know whether they are "true".I agree that we cannot know they are true in a foundationalistic sense </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/113973041640616195/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=113973041640616195' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113973041640616195'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113973041640616195'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/02/do-we-need-to-know-anything.html' title='Do we need to know anything?'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-113973022375707205</id><published>2006-02-11T23:38:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-11T23:43:43.760-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Is natural theology the only or best means to select between the competing "programs"?</title><summary type='text'>"One way of describing this perplexing situation is that    we live in a multiply ambiguous world. This is a world in which Christianity competes, it seems, with other doxastically rational religious traditions which are increasingly well­understood by it, and it by them, and them by each other; and in which each such tradition competes with many forms of secularised naturalism of which the same </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/113973022375707205/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=113973022375707205' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113973022375707205'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113973022375707205'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/02/is-natural-theology-only-or-best-means.html' title='Is natural theology the only or best means to select between the competing &quot;programs&quot;?'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-113972984981517770</id><published>2006-02-11T23:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-11T23:37:29.816-08:00</updated><title type='text'>More Reformed Epistemology</title><summary type='text'>"... the similar    argument for the rationality of Christian belief developed by Alston in Perceiving    God, which I think is the finest document of Reformed Epistemology to date."Same Source</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/113972984981517770/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=113972984981517770' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972984981517770'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972984981517770'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/02/more-reformed-epistemology.html' title='More Reformed Epistemology'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-113972969615800745</id><published>2006-02-11T23:34:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-11T23:34:56.160-08:00</updated><title type='text'>REFORMED EPISTEMOLOGY</title><summary type='text'>"The protest begins with a self­referential argument that Plantinga has stated several times. Why should we assume that no belief is rational if it is not either self­evident, or an incorrigible deliverance of consciousness, or inferred from some other belief that is in one of these two classes? The thesis that only beliefs that conform to this requirement are rational ones can not itself be </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/113972969615800745/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=113972969615800745' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972969615800745'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972969615800745'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/02/reformed-epistemology.html' title='REFORMED EPISTEMOLOGY'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-113972956929152042</id><published>2006-02-11T23:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-11T23:32:49.293-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Faith &amp; Science Chart</title><summary type='text'>See:http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Patterns.htmlFor a good chart of the basic  patterns relating Faith &amp; Science.See "Complementarity" view is supported by Augustine.I should research Augustine's epistemology.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/113972956929152042/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=113972956929152042' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972956929152042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972956929152042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/02/faith-science-chart.html' title='Faith &amp; Science Chart'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-113972921605580728</id><published>2006-02-11T23:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-11T23:26:56.060-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Is Science Logical?</title><summary type='text'>Philosophy of Science:  This is a field of study that is little known but is very important The philosophical foundations of science are taken for granted within most of the scientific community, yet they are never (well rarely ever) explicitly taught and are therefore not questioned.   Logic as typically used by scientists  Deductive Reasoning  If A is true then B is true.  Premises            </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/113972921605580728/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=113972921605580728' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972921605580728'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972921605580728'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/02/is-science-logical.html' title='Is Science Logical?'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-113972904157034781</id><published>2006-02-11T23:22:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-11T23:24:01.570-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Is Critical Realism Biblically Warranted?</title><summary type='text'>Note to Reader;This is a reply I made on someone elses blog Where do I stand in the Creation/Intelligent Design/Evolution debate?I have spent a great deal of time wrestling with many of the same ideas you are pondering.My main issue is the question of whether it is appropriate to change my view of what the Bible says due to the "provisional" theories of science.I have come to be very sceptical </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/113972904157034781/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=113972904157034781' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972904157034781'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972904157034781'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/02/is-critical-realism-biblically.html' title='Is Critical Realism Biblically Warranted?'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22332870.post-113972813099262157</id><published>2006-02-11T23:07:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2006-02-11T23:08:51.003-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Eclectic Seminarian Initial Post</title><summary type='text'>This site will contain many different kinds of posts.  Comments, Thoughts, Papers...Who knows.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/feeds/113972813099262157/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=22332870&amp;postID=113972813099262157' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972813099262157'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/22332870/posts/default/113972813099262157'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://eclecticseminarian.blogspot.com/2006/02/eclectic-seminarian-initial-post.html' title='Eclectic Seminarian Initial Post'/><author><name>Dan</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17574398333344141455</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
